Finite or Infinite? Is That The Question?

Some of our high school students think our scientific community makes the study of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) all too difficult to understand and overly complex by defying a certain commonsense logic. (Reference #1)

We have been studying simple math and simple geometries from the smallest possible measurement of a length to the largest (Reference #2). It appeared to some of the students, based on this work, that the universe is obviously finite. They have been told that intellectually and historically, it is an open question. For them, “Make a choice and see where it takes you.”

These students also conclude, “Only God is Infinite. All things within space and time are finite.” (Reference #3) When asked about all the universals-and-constants and space-and-time, the concurrence is that these are the access paths, interconnections and transformations between the Finite and the Infinite.

For the best of these students, asking the question, “What is the Infinite?” is like asking the question, “Who is God?” And, they have answers.

Of course, as a result of a little coaching, they say, “First, God is Perfect.” When asked, “What is perfection?” they echo their coach: “Perfection is order-continuity, relations-symmetry and dynamics-harmony, all rolled into one.” (Reference #4) That amounts to an understanding of the Infinite without importing all the related history and revelation from the various faith statements with our very short history throughout our little world. The Finite is another story. We turn to Euclid for inspiration to provide the academic and religious communities with our simple observations and assumptions.

Hardly postulates and axioms, our statements are a praxis in-search-of theoria:

If these statements are taken as a given, then what kind of universe and what kind of science do we have? Should we re-examine the use of infinity throughout the ages going back to the ancient Greeks? Should we reconsider the theory of indivisibles? And, perhaps we should even reconsider the very nature of the Big Bang and its theory.

Of course, that is our agenda (Reference #8), our current focus for the immediate future.

References:

1. An associated article within LinkedIn titled, Order in the Universe

2. One of the earliest reflections on this work: https://bigboardlittleuniverse.wordpress.com/

3. Initially written in November 2012, this article was first posted on March 2013 within WordPress: https://bigboardlittleuniverse.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/belief/

4. In light of those constants, universals and the finite-infinite relation, the nature of perfection seems to follow: http://smallbusinessschool.org/page1695.html

5. Examining basic structure in basic ways: http://smallbusinessschool.org/page2546.html#TetraInside

6. A new domain to explore with exponential numbers of vertices: http://doublings.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/60/

7. There are around 205.11 base-2 exponential notations (doublings, domains, layers or steps) within the Known Universe

8. An analysis of 15 key points: http://doublings.wordpress.com/2014/05/08/15/

The TinyURL for this page is: http://tinyurl.com/finitePlanck

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s